Quintana Roo is a critical part of the tourism development boom that has taken place throughout Mexico since the early 1970s (see Clancy 2001; Castellanos 2010). While tourism development throughout the region generates both revenue and employment, there are also many serious negative social and environmental repercussions to this pervasive form of development (Sanchez-Gil et al 2004:588; Clancy 2001; Hiernaux 1999; Castellanos 2010). Tourism development in Quintana Roo has led to a dramatic increase of internal migration to the coastal regions, which has resulted in tremendous population concentrations that surround well-known destinations such as Cancun. In many of the households that I have encountered over the last several years, a vast majority had at least one member of the family who migrated out to tourists zones in search of work.
The social effects and impacts of tourism development are often deeply gendered (Casellas and Holcomb 2001). Although tourism may produce positive and/or negative consequences for women, Casellas and Holcomb point out that the employment women gain from tourism, among other benefits, can improve women’s economic and social positions within their respective communities (2001:162).
In Saban and Huay Max, most men and some women leave the community on a regular basis in search of wages and work—either weekly, monthly, or for longer periods of time—while their children stay behind. Ramon*, a middle aged father from Huay Max, explained what was driving the need for many men and women to leave the community:
There is no work here. We have to leave and find work in places like Playa [del Carmen] and Cancun in order to bring back money to pay for our children’s clothes and food.
Many other parents echoed Ramon’s sentiments that temporary out-migration was motivated by the need to fulfill parental and familial obligations. This lack of economic opportunities is not an isolated issue; it is a problem faced by many families in the region.
Specifically, in rural Quintana Roo, children are being circulated because of the challenging situations that many women and their families face. In the past few decades it has traditionally been males who have been pushed to find work outside of the local community; but this trend has been drastically modified, as women are now starting to migrate out of their natal communities in search of a way to further supplement their family incomes. The main factor driving this out-migration is economic; however ecological changes to the environment have further affected rural communities’ economic needs. In response to these pressures, there are two primary factors that enable rural to urban migration for women in Quintana Roo: access to higher education and a thriving tourist economy.
The majority of the residents of Saban and Huay Max are subsistence agriculturalists that rely on getting their main food staples from their milpa (agricultural plot). The families in the region have to constantly fight with environmental elements such as drought, floods, and hurricanes. In 2005, Hurricane Wilma (the strongest tropical cyclone on record in the Atlantic basin) had devastating effects throughout the peninsula in particular along the coast of Quintana Roo. Those effects were also felt close to home in both Saban and Huay Max with the complete loss of harvest due to floods and the salting of the fields caused by rainwater mixed with ocean water. During the summer of 2008 the communities once again completely lost their harvests due to drought. I was in these communities in early September when the rains came just two weeks too late. Nothing could be done; the crops dried out and the years’ work was lost.
As women negotiate their absence within their families they incorporate various strategies to help protect their children’s emotional and physical wellbeing. As much as mothers stated that they would like to be with their children, many expressed their feeling that the safety and well-being of their children is more important than their own personal desires, sense of identity, and fulfillment of traditional gender roles.
Maribel, a 30-year-old mother who has steadily migrated out for work over the last five years, told me during an interview how difficult it was for her to be away from her children. She explained that she had wanted them to stay and live with her (and her husband) in the city, but knew that they wanted to be back in the pueblo. She understood that her children were happier in the pueblo with all of their friends and family and knew that forcefully making them relocate would have devastating effects on them. However, in choosing to leave her children behind, Maribel felt a sense of loss. Due to her extended migration out of the community, Maribel’s youngest child would sometimes accidentally call her mother “aunt”, which Maribel said hurt her sense of motherhood and the value that she had in the lives of her children. In Maribel’s case, motherhood meant economically providing for her children rather than participating in their daily care.
Liliana is the main economic provider in her household; she is one of the few women fortunate to have been able to make a living working in the community. Liliana has helped raise all three of her bother Jose’s children as well as the oldest son of her brother Mario. Liliana states that the main reason that the children don’t migrate out with their parents is because they are freer back in the pueblo than when they are in the city. She went on to say,
here in the pueblo they can run around and play with other children in the streets. They can stay out all day if they want to. Here they are not confined to a room or a small yard. In the cities it is not safe for children to walk or play around in the streets and that’s why they have to stay inside all day. The children don’t like it and that’s why they choose to stay in the pueblo.
Community ties are clearly important for children, just as they are for adults. Santiago, Liliana’s teenage nephew said that unlike his younger brother and two older sisters, he chose to stay behind because he didn’t want to leave all of his friends. Access to greater educational opportunities and resources were not significant factors influencing Santiago’s ultimate decision to stay in the community; for him the freedom he had in the pueblo, as well as his established relationships with friends and family, proved to be more important. I watched Santiago frequently move in and out of the house. He spent most of his time outside hanging out around the plaza, visiting the internet café, picking up a game of futbol, or visiting with various friends.
Stepping back and looking at how a rural community attempts to cope with increasing economic pressures through the migration of men, and now women, to tourist and urban centers demonstrates the powerful ways in which economic pressures can move bodies. It also highlights the creative and flexible ways in which families adapt to these pressures. In the case of rural Quintana Roo, the out-migration of women has further affected the lives of children, and reshaped socially acceptable norms about how children are positioned within larger family units. For families facing economic difficulties in Saban and Huay Max, the practice of child circulation enables women who migrate out for work to rely on kin relatives like their mothers, sisters, sister-in-laws, or older daughters to help raise their children and provide them with a better quality of life. This results in the establishment of closer kinship ties through the sharing of mothering.
Here child circulation functions as a survival and betterment strategy as children are moved and transferred between households. Yet, as Maribel’s experiences demonstrate, female out-migration and the subsequent circulation of children can have difficult social costs for families in places like rural Yucatan. This reality underscores the need to understand the implications of globalization beyond macro-economic perspectives. By analyzing how economic pressures affect the intimate relationships of family and motherhood, we gain a much deeper—and more complex—understanding of the local social meanings and impacts of wider political and economic processes.
University of Kentucky
*All names used in this essay are pseudonyms.
Casellas, Antònia and Briavel Holcomb. 2001. Gender, Tourism, and Development in Latin America. In Women as Producers and Consumers of Tourism in Developing Regions. Apostolopoulos, Y., Sönmez, S. F., & Timothy, D. J., ed. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
Castellanos, M. Bianet. (2010). A Return to Servitude: Maya Migration and the Tourist Trade in Cancun. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Clancy, Michael. 2001. Exporting Paradise. New York: Pergamon.
Hiernaux, Daniel Nicolas. (1999). Cancún Bliss. In The Tourist City. Dennis R. Judd and Susan S. Fainstein, eds. Pp. 124-142. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Leinaweaver, Jessaca B. (2007). On Moving Children: The Social Implications of Andean Child Circulation. In American Ethnologist, Vol. 34, No. 1. pp 163-180.
Sanchez-Gil, Patricia et al. (2004). Some socio-economic indicators in the Mexican states
of the Gulf of Mexico. In Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 47, pp. 581–596.
Walmsley, Emily. (2008). Raised by Another Mother: Informal Fostering and Kinship
Ambiguities in Northwestern Ecuador. In Journal of Latina American and Caribbean Anthropology, Vol. 13, No.1, pp. 168-195.